Why Emerging Market Equities Are Back in Focus Amid Iran Tensions

With geopolitical risk once again repricing across global markets following renewed tensions involving Iran, Aberdeen's chief investment officer has made a pointed call: emerging market equities, not gold, represent the more compelling hedge for institutional and family office portfolios at current valuations. The argument is grounded in relative value rather than sentiment. Gold has surged past USD 3,200 per troy ounce in recent weeks, a move that Aberdeen's CIO characterises as having absorbed a significant portion of the geopolitical risk premium that investors would ordinarily be paying to enter now. At those levels, the asymmetric upside that made gold attractive through 2023 and 2024 has materially compressed.

The CIO's preferred EM equity exposure is concentrated in markets with structural insulation from Middle Eastern supply-chain disruption — notably India, Indonesia, and select Southeast Asian exporters — rather than in the Gulf Cooperation Council economies most directly exposed to an Iran escalation scenario. This distinction matters for family offices running concentrated regional books. Aberdeen manages approximately USD 500 billion in assets under management globally, giving its macro calls weight that smaller advisory shops cannot replicate. The firm's positioning reflects a broader institutional shift away from reactive safe-haven buying and toward forward-looking allocation in markets where earnings growth remains intact regardless of oil price volatility.

Infrastructure Debt as the Structural Hedge Family Offices Are Underweighting

Beyond equities, Aberdeen's CIO has flagged infrastructure debt as an underappreciated hedge in the current environment — one that offers predictable cash flows, inflation linkage, and low correlation to public market volatility without the liquidity constraints that often accompany private equity commitments. For family offices in Singapore and Hong Kong managing multi-generational capital, infrastructure debt sits at a particularly useful intersection: it satisfies the income requirements of older-generation principals while offering the inflation protection that next-generation beneficiaries increasingly demand in their allocation frameworks.

The asset class has attracted growing interest from Asia-Pacific family offices structuring capital through Singapore's Variable Capital Company framework and Hong Kong's Open-ended Fund Company structure, both of which allow flexible deployment into private credit and infrastructure strategies without triggering the tax inefficiencies associated with direct offshore holding structures. Aberdeen has been actively building out its private markets infrastructure in Asia, with the firm's Singapore office serving as the regional hub for alternatives distribution. Infrastructure debt deals in the region are typically sized between USD 50 million and USD 300 million at the tranche level, a range that is accessible to larger single-family offices and comfortably within reach for multi-family office platforms aggregating capital across principals.

Gold's Diminishing Role as a Near-Term Portfolio Hedge

The CIO's caution on gold is not a structural dismissal of the metal's role in family office portfolios — it is a valuation call with a specific time horizon. Aberdeen acknowledges that gold's long-term case remains intact, particularly given sustained central bank buying from emerging market reserve managers and the continued erosion of confidence in US dollar-denominated assets among sovereign wealth funds in the Gulf and Asia. However, at current spot prices, the entry point for new or incremental gold allocation is significantly less attractive than it was twelve months ago when the metal was trading closer to USD 2,000 per troy ounce.

For family offices that built gold positions through 2022 and 2023 — a cohort that likely includes many Singapore and Hong Kong-based principals who were advised to increase hard asset exposure during the Federal Reserve's rate hiking cycle — the more pressing question is whether to trim and redeploy. Aberdeen's CIO suggests that partial reallocation from gold into EM equities and infrastructure debt is a disciplined response to the current risk-reward profile, rather than an outright exit from defensive positioning. The key metric to watch is real yield movement in US Treasuries: if real yields rise materially from current levels, gold faces additional headwinds regardless of geopolitical noise.

What This Means for Asia-Pacific Family Office Allocation Strategy

For principals of single and multi-family offices across the Asia-Pacific region, Aberdeen's repositioning carries a clear strategic implication: the era of passive safe-haven accumulation — buying gold and waiting — is giving way to a more active, conviction-driven approach to geopolitical hedging. The family offices best positioned for this environment are those that have already built the governance infrastructure to evaluate private credit and infrastructure debt on their own terms, rather than relying solely on public market proxies for risk management. That means having investment committees with the mandate and expertise to assess illiquidity premiums, duration risk, and counterparty quality in private markets.

Principals operating through Singapore VCC structures or Hong Kong OFC vehicles are particularly well-placed to execute this kind of rotation efficiently, given the regulatory flexibility those frameworks provide for deploying into alternative asset classes without triggering unnecessary tax events. The MAS's continued refinement of the VCC regime — including its expansion to cover more categories of qualifying fund managers — makes Singapore an increasingly attractive domicile for family offices looking to consolidate their alternatives exposure under a single, auditable structure. The strategic takeaway is straightforward: family offices that treat infrastructure debt and selective EM equity exposure as core allocation tools, rather than tactical overlays, will be better insulated against the next phase of geopolitical volatility than those still anchored to a gold-heavy defensive posture.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Aberdeen's CIO cautious on gold despite rising geopolitical risk from Iran?

The caution is primarily a valuation call. Gold has already rallied past USD 3,200 per troy ounce, which Aberdeen's CIO believes has absorbed much of the geopolitical risk premium. The asymmetric upside that made gold attractive at lower entry points has compressed significantly, making new or incremental positions less efficient as a hedge at current prices.

What specific emerging markets does Aberdeen favour as an alternative hedge?

Aberdeen's preference is for EM equity exposure in markets structurally insulated from Middle Eastern supply-chain disruption, including India, Indonesia, and select Southeast Asian exporters. The firm is avoiding GCC-linked equities most directly exposed to an Iran escalation scenario, focusing instead on economies where earnings growth remains intact regardless of oil price movements.

How does infrastructure debt function as a geopolitical hedge for family offices?

Infrastructure debt offers predictable, inflation-linked cash flows with low correlation to public market volatility. It does not move in lockstep with equity or bond markets during geopolitical stress events, making it a useful diversifier. Deal sizes in Asia-Pacific typically range from USD 50 million to USD 300 million per tranche, which is accessible for larger family offices deploying capital through structures like Singapore's VCC or Hong Kong's OFC.

Should family offices that already hold gold be selling their positions?

Aberdeen's CIO is not recommending a full exit from gold. The long-term structural case — central bank buying, dollar confidence erosion — remains intact. The suggestion is partial reallocation: trimming gold positions built at lower entry points and redeploying into EM equities and infrastructure debt to improve the overall risk-reward profile of the portfolio at current valuations.

How do Singapore VCC and Hong Kong OFC structures help with this kind of allocation shift?

Both frameworks offer regulatory flexibility for deploying capital into private credit and infrastructure strategies without triggering the tax inefficiencies associated with direct offshore holding structures. The MAS has continued to refine the VCC regime to accommodate a broader range of qualifying fund managers, making Singapore particularly attractive for family offices consolidating alternatives exposure under a single, auditable vehicle.

🍾 Evaluating whisky casks as an alternative allocation? Whisky Cask Club works with family offices across APAC on structured cask portfolios.