Asia's Next-Gen Wealth Transfer Is Accelerating — and Family Offices Are Central to It

Approximately USD 2.5 trillion in private wealth is expected to change hands across Asia-Pacific within the next decade, according to UBS research on intergenerational wealth transfer, making this the largest succession wave the region has ever produced. For principals running single-family offices (SFOs) or engaging multi-family office (MFO) platforms across Singapore, Hong Kong, and the wider region, that figure is not an abstraction — it is a governance deadline. The heirs preparing to receive these assets are not passive recipients; they are actively restructuring how wealth is held, governed, and deployed, and the family office is their preferred vehicle for doing so.

If you sit on the investment or governance committee of a regional family office, the UBS findings matter to you directly. The next generation is not simply inheriting wealth — they are inheriting institutions, and they intend to reshape them. Understanding how that reshaping is likely to unfold, which jurisdictions are best positioned to accommodate it, and what governance frameworks can absorb the transition without fracturing family unity is now an operational priority, not a long-term planning exercise.

What the UBS Data Actually Shows About Next-Gen Priorities

The UBS Global Family Office Report, which surveyed family offices managing a combined AUM of over USD 600 billion globally — with a significant cohort drawn from Asia-Pacific — found that next-generation principals are more likely than their predecessors to formalise governance structures, expand alternative allocations, and embed sustainability mandates into investment policy statements. In Asia specifically, where family wealth has historically been concentrated in operating businesses and real estate, the shift toward diversified financial portfolios managed through a dedicated office structure represents a meaningful structural change. UBS data indicates that roughly 68 percent of Asia-Pacific family offices surveyed expected to increase their alternatives allocation over the next two years, with private equity and private credit leading that expansion.

Beyond asset allocation, the research highlights a generational divergence in how principals think about the family office's purpose. Founders typically viewed the family office as a cost centre for tax efficiency and asset protection. Next-generation principals are more likely to treat it as a platform for impact, talent development, and inter-family diplomacy. That reframing has direct implications for how offices are staffed, how investment mandates are written, and how succession itself is documented — a point that governance advisers across Singapore and Hong Kong are increasingly raising with their clients.

"The next generation is not simply inheriting wealth — they are inheriting institutions, and they intend to reshape them. Family offices that lack formal governance documentation are the most exposed to transition risk."

Jurisdiction Choice Is a Strategic Variable, Not an Administrative One

Where a family office is domiciled increasingly determines what it can do, how quickly it can adapt, and what regulatory obligations it must satisfy. Singapore remains the dominant hub for newly established family offices in Asia, with the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) reporting that the number of family offices holding assets under management in the city-state exceeded 1,100 by end-2023 — a figure that has more than tripled since 2020. The Variable Capital Company (VCC) structure, introduced under the Variable Capital Companies Act, has become a preferred vehicle for families seeking a flexible, Singapore-domiciled fund wrapper that can hold multiple sub-funds across asset classes, making it particularly suited to next-gen principals who want to segment philanthropic capital from investment capital within a single legal structure.

Hong Kong's Open-Ended Fund Company (OFC) structure offers a comparable framework under the oversight of the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), and the Hong Kong government's family office incentive scheme — which includes a tax concession for qualifying transactions under the Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Tax Concessions for Family-Owned Investment Holding Vehicles) Ordinance 2023 — has added competitive weight to the jurisdiction's proposition. For families with operating assets in mainland China or cross-border structures spanning both sides of the Pearl River Delta, the OFC combined with Hong Kong's SFC regulatory perimeter remains strategically compelling. Meanwhile, the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) is attracting a growing number of South Asian and Southeast Asian families seeking a neutral jurisdiction with strong common law protections, and its DIFC Family Wealth Centre, launched in 2023, provides a dedicated framework for succession planning and family constitution registration.

The practical implication is that jurisdiction selection is now a first-order governance decision. Families that established their office structures in the 2000s or early 2010s under less formalised arrangements are being advised by legal counsel to review their domicile choices before the succession event occurs, not after. Restructuring a family office mid-transition is significantly more expensive and disruptive than doing so during a period of stability.

Governance Gaps That Next-Gen Principals Must Close Before Succession

The UBS research identifies governance documentation as the single most common deficiency in Asia-Pacific family offices approaching a succession event. Specifically, fewer than 40 percent of surveyed Asia-Pacific family offices had a formally documented family constitution or family governance charter — compared to over 60 percent of their European counterparts. A family constitution is not merely a symbolic document; it defines decision-making authority, sets out the rights and responsibilities of family members who are not active in the business or office, and establishes dispute resolution mechanisms that can prevent costly litigation during transitions.

Investment policy statements (IPS) represent a second governance gap. Many first-generation family offices operate on informal mandates that reflect the founder's risk appetite and relationships rather than a documented framework. When control passes to the next generation, an undocumented IPS creates immediate vulnerability — both to internal disagreement and to the risk of advisers or managers operating without clear accountability. The MAS, in its guidelines for family offices seeking the Section 13O and Section 13U tax incentive schemes in Singapore, requires that applicants demonstrate a minimum AUM of SGD 10 million (13O) or SGD 50 million (13U), employ at least one investment professional, and deploy a minimum percentage of AUM into Singapore-listed assets or funds — requirements that effectively enforce a degree of operational formalisation that many pre-succession offices have not yet achieved.

How Next-Gen Principals Are Reshaping Alternative Allocations

One of the clearest signals from the UBS data is the next generation's appetite for private markets. Among Asia-Pacific family offices with AUM above USD 100 million, private equity allocations averaged 22 percent of the total portfolio — up from approximately 14 percent five years prior. Private credit, which was barely a line item in most Asia family office portfolios before 2018, now represents an average allocation of 8 percent among the same cohort, reflecting both the global rise of direct lending strategies and the region's growing pipeline of sponsor-backed transactions requiring flexible capital.

Real assets, including infrastructure, timberland, and agricultural land, are also attracting increased interest from next-generation principals who are more attuned to long-duration assets that align with climate and sustainability mandates. The shift is not purely ideological — it reflects a recognition that listed equity markets in Asia have delivered inconsistent risk-adjusted returns over the past decade, and that illiquidity premiums in private markets can be a rational trade for families with genuinely long investment horizons. Whisky casks and other tangible alternative assets are also appearing in a small but growing number of family office portfolios as a store-of-value allocation, particularly among families with existing exposure to luxury goods and collectibles markets.

Strategic Takeaways for Family Office Principals

1. Audit governance documentation now. If your family office lacks a formally ratified family constitution and a written investment policy statement, those gaps represent material transition risk. Commission a governance review before the succession event is imminent.
2. Review domicile suitability. The MAS VCC, Hong Kong SFC OFC, and DIFC Family Wealth Centre each offer distinct structural advantages. Families with evolving cross-border needs should model the cost and tax implications of each before the next generation assumes control.
3. Formalise the IPS around next-gen priorities. If the current IPS was written around a founder's preferences, it will not serve the next generation's mandate. A collaborative IPS drafting process — involving both generations — is also a governance exercise that can surface and resolve disagreements before they become disputes.
4. Assess MAS 13O/13U compliance readiness. Singapore-domiciled offices that have not yet formalised under the incentive schemes should model whether the AUM thresholds and local investment requirements are achievable, as the schemes provide both tax benefits and regulatory credibility.
5. Build private markets due diligence capability internally. Outsourcing all private equity and private credit sourcing to placement agents is not sustainable as allocations grow. Next-gen principals should consider hiring a dedicated alternatives professional or establishing a co-investment committee with defined authority.
6. Engage philanthropy as a governance tool. Next-generation principals are significantly more likely than founders to treat philanthropic capital as central to the family office's identity. Structuring a donor-advised fund or a private foundation within the VCC or OFC framework can align the next generation's values with the office's institutional mandate.
7. Document the succession plan itself. This means naming successor principals, defining the transition timeline, and establishing a process for resolving disagreements about the office's direction. The UBS data shows that families with documented succession plans complete transitions in an average of 18 months less time than those without.

What to Watch: Key Developments for Asia Family Offices in the Next 12 Months

The MAS is expected to publish updated guidance on family office governance standards in 2025, following a consultation process that began in late 2023. Offices currently holding 13O or 13U status should monitor these developments closely, as enhanced requirements around compliance functions and investment professional qualifications are anticipated. In Hong Kong, the SFC's ongoing review of the OFC regime — including potential changes to eligible asset classes — could expand the vehicle's utility for families with significant private markets exposure.

The DIFC Family Wealth Centre is expected to release its first cohort of registered family constitutions under its new framework by mid-2025, which will provide useful precedent for families considering Dubai as a secondary or primary domicile. Principals managing cross-border structures that span Singapore, Hong Kong, and the UAE should treat the next 12 months as a window to consolidate governance documentation before regulatory requirements in all three jurisdictions tighten further. The succession wave UBS has identified is not a future event — for many Asia-Pacific families, it is already underway.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the minimum AUM required to qualify for Singapore's family office tax incentive schemes?

Under MAS guidelines, the Section 13O scheme requires a minimum AUM of SGD 10 million, while the Section 13U scheme requires a minimum AUM of SGD 50 million. Both schemes also require the family office to employ at least one investment professional and to deploy a specified percentage of AUM into Singapore-listed or Singapore-managed assets.

How does a Variable Capital Company (VCC) differ from a traditional fund structure for family offices?

A VCC is a Singapore-domiciled corporate structure that allows a single entity to operate multiple sub-funds with segregated assets and liabilities. For family offices, this means philanthropic capital, investment capital, and legacy assets can be held within separate sub-funds under one legal umbrella, simplifying administration while maintaining clear separation between pools of capital.

What is a family constitution and why does it matter for succession planning?

A family constitution is a formally ratified document that defines the governance structure of a family office, including decision-making authority, the rights of non-active family members, dividend or distribution policies, and dispute resolution mechanisms. UBS research indicates that fewer than 40 percent of Asia-Pacific family offices have one, which represents a significant governance risk during succession transitions.

Which jurisdictions are most commonly used by Asia-Pacific family offices for succession structuring?

Singapore, Hong Kong, and Dubai (DIFC) are the three primary jurisdictions. Singapore's VCC and MAS regulatory framework are favoured for their transparency and tax efficiency. Hong Kong's OFC and SFC oversight appeal to families with mainland China connections. The DIFC Family Wealth Centre is gaining traction among South Asian and Southeast Asian families seeking a neutral common law jurisdiction with dedicated succession infrastructure.

Source: Whisky Bulletin coverage of whisky on Whisky Bulletin.

🍾 Evaluating whisky casks as an alternative allocation? Whisky Cask Club works with family offices across APAC on structured cask portfolios.